Thursday, November 30, 2006

11.30.6 - Home



It's December again, and there you are with all your co-workers at the office Christmas party and everbody is drinking a lot, having fun and then drivin’ home. And since you see everyone drinking and then heading home in their cars, you figure “I can too”.
My friends, this is just the beginning of how alcohol can affect your driving. It doesn’t just include the obvious vision and reaction time; it impairs your mental judgment as well. The fact is that alcohol quickly disrupts your normal thinking patterns and you’re suddenly not in the condition to recognize and adjust for it. Therefore, you can make these critical errors in judgment. And we’re all celebratin’ this time of year. And this is the problem.
Scientists have discovered that alcohol in the brain causes the mind to magnify certain things and minimize other things, so essential facts become distorted. For example, you can talk yourself into thinking that you are an exception to the rule since “I can hold my liquor, so it is ok to drive.” Or you might convince yourself that it’s ok to drive since the streets are mostly empty anyhow and you won’t run into much traffic. This is what is called impaired thinking and can also be an example of denial. And denial – which prevents you from taking corrective action of any impaired decision - can be the greatest impairment of all.
Sadly, most drivers are unaware of how alcohol impairs their driving. Many think that in order for driving to be seriously affected, you need to see double or be unable to walk a straight-line. Nope. The fact that you’re actually unaware of the affect of the alcohol on your vision makes it especially dangerous to rely on your judgment at that moment whether you can drive or not. Besides your vision, alcohol in the blood and brain influences you motor reactions. You do not have to feel drunk. In fact you can feel quite awake and energetic. Yet, your reaction time has slowed down. If ordinarily you need a quarter of a second to hit the brake, with alcohol in your bloodstream, you might need a full second or possible two seconds. But you don’t give yourself two seconds so you crash into the car ahead of you.
All of these factors combine to increase the probability of a fatal accident due to the consumption of alcohol and driving under its influence. Especially this time of year. And since I’m on the roads for a living, I am askin’ you to take a risk assessment of your plans and situations and make intelligent choices and appropriate actions to save your life, the lives of your loved ones, and my life as well. Take responsibility for your decisions and make the right choices about your drivin’ during the holidays, don’t become a statistic and a memorial service.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

11.21.6 - St Helens to Seattle



My dad used to say, if ya want to find out what's going on in town; "go getcher haircut".


Well, it's been damn-near two whole months since I posted anything - Partly me and some long trips, and partly some trouble with blogspot, (that's pretty-much all fixed now...hopefully).


I was really glad to hear about Phil Barlow winning his election a couple of weeks back. I've always enjoyed spendin' time gabbing with Phil in the old Waynes parking lot, he'll be a great asset in City Council. And I hear tell that Phil is quite upset about some kind of a push to finish up with "some items" on the "agenda" before the new Council-elect takes over in January.

This is to say that the St. Helens City Council is working against the clock to push through a City Charter change. Some in town say that the real purpose of a charter change is to upgrade the City Administrator position to City Manager.
ok...The first thing I heard that struck me was the fact that they are citing the ridiculous City Satisfaction Survey from a year past as their reason for the change. If it's the same Satisfaction Survey that I recall, there was nothing in it from John Q. Public screaming for upgrading any city positions at all. Actually, as I remember, most people seemed to think that the city was not very responsive to the public need and were very unhappy with BOTH the City Administrator and the City Planner. The citizens surveyed didn't want them to have more power...rather, they wanted them both fired. On top of all this: Council never published the satisfaction survey results
publically, which were in fact, quite harsh and damning.
So what we seem to have is an outgoing council, hell-bent on changing the City Charter, whose decisions seem to be counter to the will of the people...but then again, THAT'S really nothing new, is it?

So the scuttlebutt I hear is that the outgoing regime has hand-picked a "committee of friends" to put together this new "Charter", and they need to get this done ASAP, before Phil and the new council comes in.
A Charter Change Election would not be until 2008, but a new charter can be presented to the public
- along with what ever spin they would like to include - and unless there is any publicity to the contrary, a few people think it'll probably pass.
Keep your eyes on things here! It's a nice li'l town y'all have. Good to be back for a day or two.
-Tom